Date: 1889
Item: Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1889,s1 and Prevention of Corruption Act 1906,s1
Date: 12th June 2006
Item: Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights Letter
Date: 28th August 2007
Item: Office for Judicial Complaints Letter
Date: 18th September 2012
Item: Office for Judicial Complaints Letter
Date: 5th September 2003
Item: Gareth Peirce Solicitors Letter
Date: 24th March 2004
Item: Bhatt Murphy Solicitors Letter
Date: 2 April 2004
Item: Bhatt Murphy Solicitors Letter
Date: 22nd April 2004
Item: Grenville J Walker Solicitors Letter
Date: 19 July 2004
Item: Birnberg Peirce & Partners Letter
Date: 8th July 2005
Item: Carter Moore Solicitors Letter
Date: 3 February 2006
Item: Public Interest Lawyers Letter
Date: 18 April 2006
Item: Deighton Guedalla Solicitors Letter
Date 11th June 2006
Item: Complain to the Department for Constitutional Affairs about the unwillingness of the Legal Profession to pursue civil redress against the Metropolitan Police Commissioner for Malicious Prosecution, following full Acquittals of all charges.
Date: 8th September 2006
Item: Law Society Letter
Date: 28th August 2014
Item: Letter from Custody to State Legal Aid Representatives Charles Allotey Solicitors
Date: 8th September 2014
Item: Letter from Custody to State Legal Aid Representatives Charles Allotey Solicitors
Date: 16th September 2014
Item: Letter from Custody to State Legal Aid Representatives Charles Allotey Solicitors, Formally DISMISSING them from the specific Case Legal Aid Representation, for their apparen continued reluctance to present Judicial Corruption facts and Evidence arguments to the Court, in line with Defence Counterclaim INSTRUCTIONS.
Date: 21stApril 2008
Item: Strong Complanlain to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Ian Blair after the Department coninued in the foot steps of the previous Commissioner JOHN STEVENS to ignore legitimate comlaints, in order to protect the JUDICAL establishment and any posibility of the Metropolitan Police Department involvement in executing an UNLAWFUL WARRANT issued outside the confines of the RULE OF LAW by Justice Toulson.
Date: 28th September 2011
Item: Complain to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe
Date: 15th February 2012
Item: Complain to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe
Date: 26th June 2014
Item: Complain to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe
Date: 7th November 2017
Item: Complain to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick
Date: 20th June 2018
Item: Complaint to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Cressida Dick
Date: 19th September 2022
Item: Complain to Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Mark Rowley
Date: 15th December 2002
Item: Attorney General Letter with the Metropolitan Police Department copied-in
Date: 7th January 2013
Item: Letter to Metropolitan Police Department
Date: 1st April 2013
Item: Complain to the Independent Police Complaints Commission
Date: 1st August 2013
Item: Letter to Metropolitan Police Department ALLOCATED Complaints Investigator Sergeant Jeremy Graves formally and REASONABLY REUESTING an APPOINTMENT schedule for FORMAL PRESENTATION of comlaint to be orally delivered/Recorded in line with all customary practice of Registering Criminal Complaints by the Metropolitan Police Department at the time.
Date: 30th September 2015
Item: Metropolitan Police Department, (DPS Complaints Support Team) Letter
Date: 1st October 2015
Item: Letter to the Metropolitan Police Department, Brixton Station Commander
Date: 20th October 2015
Item: Independent Police Complaints Commission
Date: 24th February 2016
Item: Metropolitan Police Department NON RESPONSE to communication regarding Investigating Judicial Corruption.
Date: 15th April 2016
Item: Appeal to Independent Police Complaints Commission
Date: 30th July 2017
Item: Independent Police Complaints Commission
Date: 1st June 2018
Item: Complaint to the Metropolitan Police Department, Directorate of Professional Standards
Date: 24th July 2018
Item: Complaint to Independent Office for Police Conduct
Date: 4th August 2018
Item: Complaint to Independent Office for Police Conducts
Date: 19th August 2018
Item: Complain to the Metropolitan Police Department, Directorate of Professional Standards
Date: 3rd December 2012
Item: Metropolitan Police Department's INCREDULOUS VOID OF ALL COMMON SENSE DECISION that no one would ever have believed, save it is here in writing; clearly stating that CRIMINAL activities by the UK Judiciary, is NOT required to be RECORDED as a Crime and hence neither warranting any criminal investigation.
Date: 9th January 2013
Item: Independent Police Complaints Commission Letter UPHELDING my Appeal Application to the body against the Metropolitan Police Department's INCREDULOUS VOID OF ALL COMMON SENSE DECISION that that no one would believe save for it is secured in writing from the Metropolitan Police Department staffs, who themselves seldom knows the law they are recruited to ENFORCE. SHAMEFULLY, for all to see is the fact that I had to rigorously fight the Metropolitan Police Department claim that CRIMINAL activities by the UK Judiciary, is NOT required to be RECORDED as a Crime and hence neither warranting investigation.
Dated: 26th February 2013
Item: The eventual notification after so much resistance that the Metropolitan Police Department has RELUCTANTLY finally conceded to RECORDED my complain. However, doing so remain FUTILE without whilst no opportunity is provided for it to obtain my STATEMENTS with regards the FACTS of violations; making the simple registration of complain WITHOUT facts for a meaningful investigation meaningless and SUPERFICIAL altogether !!!
Date: 23rd May 2013
Item: Independent Police Complaints Commission Letter which UPHELD my Appeal Application to the body over the Metropolitan Police Department and its ALLOCATED INVESTIGATOR Sergeant Jeremy Graves TOTAL and DELIBERATE attempt to OBFUSCATE and MISCONSTRUE my complaint, in order to make it appear totally CONFUSSED and DELUSIONAL.
Dated: 15th August 2013
Item: ALLOCATED Complaints Investigator Sergeant Jeremy Graves long held letter; in deliberately delayed responsese to my COMMUNICATION RIGHTLY requesting a FORMAL APPOINTMENT slot to visit the police station in order to engage the PROPER PROCESS for RELAYING A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT. The INSISTENCE that it be done only through the POSTAL SERVICE is wholly UNREASONABLE and outright HOSTILE to the complanant for the purposes of staving all proper recording of Crime as a complaint, let alone its investigation !!!
Date: 7th April 2003
Item: Snaresbrook Crown Court Certificate of Acquittal; Following FIRST unsuccessful attempt to use the Criminal Justice System against me because of my stance that the Judiciary and the Metropolitan Police Department MUST each be made fully ACCOUNTABLE, for their roles in securing False and Unlawful Imprisonmnts; conrary to the law.
Date: 22nd July 2005
Item: Inner London Crown Court Certificate of Acquittal, following a SECOND major attempt to use the Criminal Justice System to remove me from delingently DEMANDING ACCOUNTABILITY and REDRESS of the Judiciary and Metropolitan Police Department, for their joint FAILURES and OMISSIONS.
Date: 22nd October 2014
Item: Inner London Crown Court Certificate of Acquittal; following a THIRD attempt to weaponise the Justice System against me, by recruiting and pressurising my VISA OVERSTAYER live-in partner as informant; recruited, to make FALSE claims 'of holding a knife to the throat and threaneing to Kill her, in order to secure my CONVICTION and subsequent planned HOME OFFICE DEPORTATION. In benefit, it would remove all Accountability and Redress Demands which the Judiciary and the Metropolitan Police Department wish to keep hidden from the OVER GOVERNED, OPPRESSED and OVER TRUSTING and Compliant British public.
Date: 3rd July 2020
Item: Claim Against the Metropolitan Police Department
Date: 2nd October 2020
Item: HM Courts & Tribunal Service, Administrative Court Strike-out Letter which shows it DELIBERATELY attempting to obfuscate Records with deliberate misrepresentation of the Defendants and Certificate References. Generally, trying to obscure the fact that the LEGAL CIVIL ACTION taken out also involves the Judiciary as one of the DEFENDANT alongside the HOME OFFICE and the METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT. It should be of no surprise to anyone that the Judiciary is using its INFLUENCE to prevent the matter going into Court be arranging its STRIKING-OUT behind closed doors.