The Outline Schedules of Claim

Judicial Perversion of justice - the act of obstructing, interfering with, or manipulating the legal process or the proper administration of justice. It encapsulate all conclusive act that involves (someone) preventing justice from being served on themselves or on someone else, by Disposal, or Fabricating of evidence.

Complaints of Judicial Violations, readily dismissed prior to any investigations into the facts, as UNMERITOUS complain deriving entirely from dissatisfaction with unfavourable Judicial outcomes, presumed to have been conducted, entirely in accordance with the Rule of Law

UNLAWFUL arrogant denial of victim’s rights, to attain redress for gross Violations of the Due Process by the Judiciary and its Members

Commencement of the lawful rebellion affirmative action campaign challenging a corrupt and unrepentant establishment, the Judiciary of England and Wales.

Cloaked and led by principles of law (as established under Article 61, Magna Carta 1215 and several Articles of the UK’s very own Human Rights 1998) the Campaign members fearlessly badgered to enter UK Courts by any means necessary to confront the Judiciary with evidence of its own ODIOUS law-breaking as a last resort.

False Arrest, False Prosecutions, False Convictions and False Imprisonments of Campaign For Truth and Justice Human Rights Activist group and individual members by the UK Judiciary in absence of JURISDICTIONAL authority to preside.

Further Breach of Judicial Disqualification and Recusal Rules by the Judiciary of England and Wales at Highbury Corner Magistrates’ - the instrument that enables parties to ensure the impartiality of the judges who are competent to resolve a given dispute, are themselves free of ‘intimate friendship’ let alone one of a shared immediate family blood relationship connection (of a direct brother).

WITTING and UNWITTING Failures to provide Appeals fallen due as of Right, to Campaign for Truth and Justice, Human Rights Activist Defendants, following Convictions and trial outcomes breaching Articles 1, 2,3,5,6,7,8,11 and 14 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

Further Judicial Perversions of the course of justice - the act of obstructing, interfering with, or manipulating the legal process or the proper administration of justice. It encapsulate all conclusive act that involves (someone) preventing justice from being served on themselves or on someone else, by Disposal, or Fabricating of evidence.

Breach of Article 6(1) HRA 1998 INALIENABLE right to a FAIR, INDEPENDENT and IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL, by the Judiciary of England and Wales – In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.

Breach of Article 5(5) HRA 1998 by the Judiciary of England and Wales – Wherein, everyone who has been the victim of arrest or detention in contravention of the provisions of this Article shall have an enforceable right to compensation.

Breach of Section 6(1) HRA 1998 by the Judiciary of England and Wales – it is unlawful for a public authority to Act in a way which is incompatible with the Convention rights.

Breach of Section 7(1) HRA 1998 by the Judiciary of England and Wales - On-Going failures and omissions to allow a person who claims that a public authority has acted or proposes to act in a way which is made unlawful (by SECTION 6(1) HRA 1998) to bring proceedings against that authority under SECTION 7(1)(a) HRA 1998.

Breach of Section 7(1)(a) HRA 1998 by the Judiciary of England and Wales - On-Going failures and omission to allow a victim of existing and unresolved violations by a public authority, (as defined by SECTION 6(3) HRA 1998) to bring proceedings against such violating authorities for Redress ad Remedy in law.

Breach of Section 7(1)(b) HRA 1998 by the Judiciary of England and Wales – Numerous contemptuous disregard and failures to honour GUARANTEED civil legal rights provided (Appellant/Defendant) victims of existing and unresolved violations by a public authority, as a Protection of law to RELY and invoke SECTION 7(1)(b) HRA 1998 as a Lawful Defence and Justification in any Criminal or Civil Proceedings instigated by a public authority.

Breach of Article 7 HRA 1998 by the Judiciary of England and Wales - (1.)  No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed.

(2.)  This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognised by civilised nations.

Abuse of (Judicial) Process and Procedures

Judiciary Knowingly Mislead, Misrepresent, Misinterpret and Misapply the law

Judiciary in CONTEMPTUEOUS violations of SECTION 13(1) ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE ACT 1960                 

HARROW CROWN COURT’S CONTEMPEOUS DISREGARD FOR (SECTION 7(1)(a) HRA 1998 AND SECTION 7(1)(b) HRA 1998)

Pervert DISMISSAL CONTRARY TO THE RULE OF LAW, in further contraventions of ARTICLE 6(1) HRA 1998; an UNCHALLENGED, UNOPPOSED APPELLANT APPEAL HEARING, NOT ATTENDED, CHALLENGED, OR OPPOSED BY THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (CPS) OR ITS AGENT

FABRICATION AND FALSE REPRESENTATIONS OF JUDICIAL OFFICE RECORDS OF COURT PROCEEDINGS

PREJUDICIAL MISREPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION ON COURT DOCUMENTS

DELIBERATE SABOTAGE OF APPLICATION TO EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY THE JUDICIARY

Repeated Corrupt attempts to BLOCK Appeals as of right entering court, by falsely claiming that Convictions are emanating from Magistrates Court when documents clearly show where the Conviction originates from.

Nonfeasance – the failure to act or perform a duty that one is legally obligated to do, when there is a duty to do so. It is a type of wrongdoing that occurs when an individual neglects their duty or fails to fulfill their legal obligations, resulting in harm or loss to another party.

Misfeasance – the improper performance or execution of a lawful act, resulting in harm or loss to another party.

Therefore accidental/unintentional act of an individual or entity having taken action but in a negligent or wrongful manner and thus failing to perform the duty correctly.

Malfeasance - the willful and intentional act of doing that which one has no legal right to do at all. Its is the wrongful or unlawful conduct by a public official or someone in a position of authority. It involves the intentional commission of an act that is illegal, immoral, or otherwise harmful, often for personal gain or to the detriment of others. Malfeasance can take various forms, including corruption, abuse of power, bribery, fraud, and other actions that violate the law or breach the duties of the individual or an agency.